Thursday, 22 January 2009

Eggleston @ Whitney




The exhibition covers various periods of the artist's production. It presents a selection of works from his main projects/exhibitions/books, including early black and white works and video.

Overall, the exhibition constitutes an interesting retrospective of Eggleston work which consist mainly of color photography.

Eggleston and his contemporaries from the 70', such as Stephen Shore and Joel Meyerowitz, contributed to make color photography recognized as a legitimate artistic medium. Still the pictures are not examples of experimentation into the use of color. Probably the photographers of the period were saved by fellows artists who used color to explore abstraction.

Instead, color is used to portray aspects of reality as the photography of that period dwelved quasi obsessively into the dire realism of scenes such parking lots and gas stations, motel rooms, broken toys, etc.

Color became a medium of choice also probably due to its convenience and ability to capture immediacy. For instance, the exhibition include some vintage drug store prints, which are great. Most of the show prints are dye transfer, which like Cibachrome prints, deliver images of popping color and are resistant to fade. The best are the vintage prints included in the "14 pictures" serie which open the show. Modern prints while interesting are less striking. Also very nice are the occasional exhibition prints as well as some inkjet prints, notably from the "5x7" series of portraits.

The exhibition most of all shows Eggleston ease and sophisticated composition skills.

The texts is well written, factual and informative. The relationship between the author and the American south and Memphis in particular is explained in great length.

The early B/W pix and the videos are skipable. In general I would advise against including videos altogether at shows as I find these exhibits noisy and distracting.

Among the series on show

Graceland: Illustrates Elvis kitsch. WE commercial work. Text states WE didn't care much about Elvis.

Election eve: WE to cover Carters election campaign, instead portrays aspects of decaying south, such as old barns. From show/catalogue text

Just before the election of 1976, Eggleston received a commission from Rolling Stone magazine to photograph presidential candidate Jimmy Carter, his family, and their hometown of Plains, Georgia. Carter was away campaigning while Eggleston was there photographing, however, so none of the images show the politician. Although the magazine never printed the photographs, the following year Election Eve was published in two volumes containing one hundred chromogenic prints, taken in Plains and the surrounding area.

The publication’s format was based on Alexander Gardner’s 1865 two-volume Gardner’s Photographic Sketch Book of the Civil War, which contained original albumen prints of sites, scenes, and people associated with the Civil War. More than a century later, Eggleston’s Election Eve presents the South as a place of flat fields, grand old trees, and dilapidated wooden structures interspersed with some signs of modernity, like oil tanks, or plastic flags blowing in the wind. Bypassing any overt references either to the violent war that divided the country or to the important southern Democrat, Eggleston’s images of the land tell their own story of past and present.


Los Alamos: result of several trips WE took in the late 60' and early 70', most spontaneous work, predates "Guide", never published, great example of travel photography.

WE Guide/MoMA 1976: classic stuff

Black Keys Live

Recorded in Amsterdam in 2006





Just to remind how it was supposed to sound before the "mickey mouse experience"...


Check out Dan Auerbach solo album "Keep It Hid" (Nonesuch),

To be released February 10.

Note that Vinyl LP version contains one 180g vinyl LP in a gatefold jacket which also includes the CD in a paper sleeve and free MP3 download.

Wednesday, 31 December 2008

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

Nikon lenses on Canon EOS



It is possible to mount Nikon lenses on Canon EOS bodies with a simple adapter ring that can be found online. All Nikon lenses become mechanically compatible. Only Nikon G lenses are less practical to use as they have no diaphragm ring (not to mention Nikon S rangefinder lenses). Apart from that all Nikon lenses can be mount bot those with F ring (uncut) and AI/AIS/AF/AFD.


Nikkor S auto 50mm f1.4 on Canon EOS 50D

Of course, you have to focus manually and contrary to Nikon bodies, Canon does not provide focus confirmation. However it provides metering. Lenses focus beyond infinity. So overall, this require a bit of attention and is not as carefree as leaving the AF kit zoom all the time. Results may vary in terms of quality of the images produced depending on the lens used.

With 50D, being a cropped sensor camera, the lenses that are most interesting to use are Macros or fixed tele (200 f4). On 5D, being a full frame camera, one can use nikon wides, 50/1.4, vintage 85/1.4, etc. One interesting feature of EOS 50D/5DmkII is the hability to use live view function for fine tuning the focus (not for action photography). Another approach is to use hyperfocal and rely on auto-ISO function given the good high ISO performances of the cameras.

Friday, 5 December 2008

F-35B - USMC Trials

So DoD finally came around to the idea of getting the original Yak 38...

F-35B land VTOL trial




YK-38 sea deployment





YK-36 Trials

Monday, 1 December 2008

LUMIX G1



Ok by now everybody has seen or at least heard about this camera.

It's cool (it comes in red if you want it), compact and delivers good images.

So where is the catch?

No optical view finder - replaced by a electronic one

No prism means no glass - lighter body and less costs

First impressions

Its an improvement compared to bridge cameras but still if you have a nice LCD on the back (which is movable) maybe you don't need at all the viewfinder.

Size - I like the compact camera body and the design, but frankly I hold it with my three fingers (not that I have particularly large hands). In general, I favors using additional battery grips which provide better handling especially with large lenses. For using the G1, I would immediately look for the grip - which btw is not foreseen.

The G1 is aimed at being used with compact lenses, but still despite appearances, the camera is not that compact. Canon G10 is more compact - but it has a built in lens which cannot be replaced, so its not an SLR. But 450D and even its lighter version the 1000D have more resolution has an optical view finder with mirrors and everything (ok don't expect High Point) and sells for less. Pentax KM is also an interesting camera and holds better in the hand.

In fact, probably in this league of cameras, the rangefinder type (such as G10 which is the grand nephew of the Canonet) seems better suited for descreet, available light, quality lens photography. The Lumix is rather based on a video camera design, hence electronic view finder, movable screen, and contrast detection autofocus.

The funny thing is that it does NOT have (yet) video capacity. Panasonic displayed a prototype of an HD capable G1 which will be available in 2009. A full HD version may not be available before 2010. Even then, it will remain to be seen which functionalities the lens will retain when shooting video.


The only "concessions" to SLR design are the use of a mechanical shutter and the use of interchangeable lenses, which with the adoption of the new micro four/thirds format are more compact than ever.

First conclusions

Its a novel design which builds on the bridge cameras legacy of combining features from videocam and SLRs.

The camera seem to deliver, according to various commentators, a good level of image quality which position it above the average compact digital camera and among the medium high level of the most recent consumer DSLRs.

Strong points

Image quality

compactness

Live view and in lens Image Stabilisation

LCD panel is large and moving

More questionable points

Has a lot of videocam genes but... no video

Price - you can get a D60 with double lens kit for the price

New lens (sub?) system

Not that compact compared to G10, 450D or Pentax KM

LUMIX G-1 Lenses

G1 and any other Micro Four Thirds camera can also take any regular size Four Thirds lens through the use of the DMW-MA1APP adapter (see photo enclosed).

However, most of the functionalities of other 4/3 lenses will not work on G1.

Panasonic is not such a big producer of photo lenses, maybe they are even made by others. Therefore I don't know what is the rationale for creating a new range of lenses which is not compatible, given shorter back focus distance, with other cameras using the same bayonet.

However, some nice combinations are possible...



G1 with Leica 25mm lens 4/3 mount + micro 4/3 adapter




Leica R 100mm f2.8 macro Elmarit on G1 with R to 4/3 adapter and micro 4/3 adapter



Panasonic plan to release at least three more lenses in 2009; a 14-140mm f/4-f.5.6 OIS, a 7-14mm f/4 and a 20mm f/1.7 (see prototype on display at Photokina).

The lenses like all 4/3 lenses have a x2 crop factor - so the 20 is a 40mm slightly lower than a normal lens.

Who said pancake?!